Federalism: Models, Types & Features

A state is usually classified as either federal or unitary depending on how powers are distributed. In a federal model, the constitution clearly divides authority between the central government and regional governments such as states or provinces, whereas in a unitary system power remains centralized. Simply put, a government divides power between central government and smaller regional governments like states or provinces ensuring autonomy for each level . Models of federalism remains a key subject in comparative politics, with scholars like Harold J. Laski once dismissing it as outdated and William H. Riker later highlighting its resurgence . Today, nearly 25 countries including India, the USA, Canada and Germany follow different models of federalism, collectively covering about 40% of the world’s population . While most large nations adopt federal structures, a notable exception is China which continues to operate as a unitary state .

Download Models of Federalism PDF

Federalism: Meaning and Origin

The term federation comes from the Latin foedus, meaning treaty or agreement highlighting that a federal state is essentially a union formed by a compact among its parts . It involves dividing government powers between the national level and regional units like states or provinces, so each retains a degree of autonomy . Scholars have defined Models of federalism in various ways . For example, Robert Garan described it as a system where sovereignty is split so each level of government is independent within its domain . William S. Livingstone emphasized preserving the identity of each component while creating a unified political entity and William H. Riker saw it as dividing government functions so each level has areas of final authority .

Federal systems usually emerge in two ways . Through a centripetal process, independent states unite for shared security or economic benefits as seen in the USA, where thirteen states voluntarily formed a federation . In contrast, a centrifugal process begins when a central government creates or empowers provinces, often to improve administration or address regional demands . India illustrates this model, where the central government can alter state boundaries, create new states, merge provinces or incorporate new territories like the integration of Sikkim or the formation of Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand .

Read also Non Governmental Organisations of UGC NET Political Science

Federalism PDF Download

Students can download concise Federalism PDF notes for quick revision before exams. The PDF covers federal model:

• Meaning of the federal model of governance.
• How a government divides power between central government and smaller regional governments, like states or provinces.
• Key features, benefits, and challenges of federalism.
• Different models of federalism explained simply.
• Examples: USA, India, Germany, and answer to whether Canada is federal or unitary.

Download Models of Federalism PDF

Key Features of Federalism

A short setup first: federal systems are built from a few core building blocks that appear, in some form, across most federations. These blocks keep the center strong enough to act for the whole country, while the regions stay strong enough to reflect local values. The following features distill what you’ll see in authoritative references and in real-world practice. Think of them as the minimum architecture of a federal model rather than a rigid checklist.

• Constitutional division of powers. The national and regional governments get distinct law-making areas, often called “competences” or “lists,” and both govern the same people. This division is written down, not implied.
• Dual sovereignty with supremacy rules. Each level is sovereign within its field, but a supremacy clause or similar rule decides conflicts (often giving federal law priority in shared fields).
• Written, comparatively rigid constitution. Core federal model provisions need special procedures—like supermajorities or joint consent—to change.
• Independent judiciary. Courts, often a supreme or constitutional court, police the boundaries between levels and settle center–state disputes.
• Upper chamber representing regions (often). Many federations use bicameralism with an upper house that channels regional voices into national lawmaking.
• Fiscal federalism. Revenue powers, transfers, and tax fields split across levels to fund responsibilities and manage imbalances. This field, named by economist Richard Musgrave (1959), studies how to divide money, spending, and taxes across levels.
• Intergovernmental mechanisms. Councils, conferences, or committees coordinate shared tasks without erasing autonomy. (Examples appear below for India.) 

Read also Types Of Constitution of UGC NET Political Science

Types of Federalism

Before listing types, note that federations evolve. A country can move from one pattern to another as politics, economics, and courts shift. “Types” are teaching tools that capture common models of federalism; in practice, countries often mix them or change over time.

• Dual federalism (layer-cake). Clear, separate spheres; limited overlap. Historically linked to early U.S. federalism.Cooperative (marble-cake) federalism. Interwoven roles with joint programs; the marble metaphor comes from Morton Grodzins.
• Creative / Coercive / Regulatory federalism. Great Society-era expansion of national programs and standards, often setting conditions for state/local action.
• New federalism (devolution). Pushes power and discretion back to states, often via block grants (Nixon/Reagan eras).
• Picket-fence federalism. Policy specialists across levels form vertical networks by program (the “pickets”); jurisdiction lines matter less than issue-specific coordination.
• Symmetric vs. asymmetric federalism. All units have equal powers (symmetric) versus some units having special autonomy (asymmetric).
• “Coming-together” vs. “holding-together.” Small units pool sovereignty to form a federation (e.g., U.S., Switzerland) versus a large state devolving to accommodate diversity (e.g., India, Spain).

Read also Philosophy Of The Constitution of UGC NET Political Science

Models of Federalism (Explained in Detail)

The concept of models of federalism gives us a clearer picture of how federations function in practice. Each federal model shows a different way in which power is divided and shared.

Dual Federalism (Layer-Cake Model)

Dual federalism is called the layer-cake model because power is divided into separate layers, with little overlap. In this system, the central government looks after national functions such as defense, foreign policy and currency while states or provinces manage local areas like education, law and order and health . The U.S. in its early years and Canada at Confederation are classic examples . The main strength of this model is clarity of responsibilities and respect for state autonomy . Its weakness is that modern issues like climate change or pandemics often cross boundaries, making strict separation impractical .

Cooperative Federalism (Marble-Cake Model)

Cooperative federalism also known as the marble-cake model, mixes the roles of national and regional governments . Instead of keeping responsibilities separate, both levels share duties, co-fund programs and administer services together . A well-known example is the U.S. New Deal, where federal and state governments collaborated to revive the economy . In India, the GST Council reflects cooperative federalism as both Union and State governments take joint decisions on taxation . This model ensures shared responsibility and nationwide development, but the drawback is blurred accountability -citizens may not know whether to credit or blame the center or the states .

Creative or Coercive Federalism

Creative federalism, sometimes called coercive federalism, tilts the balance toward the central government . Here, the center designs national programs and attaches strict conditions to grants provided to the states . The U.S. during the 1960s “Great Society” programs is the best example, where states had to follow federal rules in areas like civil rights and education if they wanted funding . The strength of this model is that it protects rights and ensures equality across regions . The limitation is that it reduces the independence of states and makes them financially dependent on the center .

New Federalism (Devolutionary Model)

New federalism attempts to return power and flexibility to the states . Instead of multiple conditional grants, states receive broader block grants, giving them the freedom to decide how to spend funds . This model gained popularity in the U.S. under Presidents Nixon and Reagan . In India, since the 1991 economic reforms, states have gained more freedom in economic decision-making and compete with each other to attract investment . The strength of this model is increased flexibility and innovation at the local level . Its drawback is uneven development as wealthier states benefit more while poorer ones struggle .

Picket-Fence Federalism

The picket-fence model focuses on cooperation within specific policy areas rather than the whole system . Imagine a fence where each vertical picket represents a policy area like health, transport or education . Specialists from federal, state and local levels work closely within that area, forming strong vertical networks . This model is efficient in technical fields and ensures expertise-driven policy . However, it can reduce the role of elected officials, as bureaucrats and experts take the lead in decision-making .

Symmetric and Asymmetric Federalism

Symmetric federalism means all states or provinces enjoy the same constitutional powers as in the United States or Australia . Asymmetric federalism gives some units special powers due to cultural, linguistic or historical needs . Canada demonstrates this through Québec’s special status for protecting French culture, while India shows asymmetry in provisions like Articles 371–371J for states such as Nagaland and Mizoram . The strength of symmetry is uniformity across the country, while asymmetry better accommodates diversity . The weakness of asymmetry is that it may create jealousy or demands for similar privileges from other states .

Coming-Together and Holding-Together Federalism

Coming-together federalism occurs when independent states unite voluntarily to form a federation for security, strength, or economic advantage. Examples include the United States, Switzerland, and Australia. Holding-together federalism happens when a large unitary state devolves power to maintain national unity . India and Spain are prominent cases where decentralization was used to accommodate regional diversity . The strength of coming-together models is strong collective unity while holding-together models succeed in preserving unity through diversity . Both approaches reflect different historical needs but fall within the broad federal model .

Read also Liberal Constitutionalism of UGC NET Political Science

Quick Table of Major Models

A short table of models of federalism can help you compare core features quickly. Read the four lines below to frame what you’ll see. First, the federal model differ by who decides and how money moves. Second, they also differ in who implements programs day to day. Third, some models emphasize clear lines; others emphasize shared work. Fourth, the same country can cycle through several models over decades.

Models of Federalism - Canada

Canada is federal or unitary? Models of federalism of Canada was established by the British North America Act of 1867 which created the Dominion of Canada as a self-governing part of the British Empire . This union initially brought together Upper and Lower Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, with other provinces joining later . The Canadian federation now includes Ontario, Quebec, the Western and Maritime Provinces along with the Yukon and Northwest Territories . The Canada Act of 1982 further reinforced this federal arrangement .

Written and Rigid Constitution

Canada’s federal model is built on a written constitution . Originally, the 1867 Act lacked an amendment formula requiring the Canadian Parliament to seek the British Parliament’s approval to change constitutional provisions . Over time, this evolved . In 1949, Canada’s Parliament gained limited amendment powers . The Canada Act of 1982 established five amendment procedures : 

• federal amendments by Parliament alone
• provincial amendments decided within the province
• broader amendments requiring approval by at least seven provinces holding 50% of the population (the “7/50 rule”)
• unanimous consent from all provinces for certain provisions
• changes affecting only specific provinces needing consent from those provinces.

This makes the Canadian constitution quite rigid in matters affecting the federal structure.

Bicameral Legislature

Canada is federal or unitary? Canada follows a bicameral models of federalism, with Parliament consisting of the Queen, the Senate and the House of Commons. The Senate, representing the provinces, now has 104 members (up to 118 if expanded), with 24 each from Ontario, Quebec, the Western Provinces, and the Maritimes. Yukon and the Northwest Territories each send two senators. The House of Commons, initially with 181 members, has expanded to 282.

Division of Powers

Canada’s models of federalism clearly defines powers in the Constitution Act, 1867 . Sections 91 and 92(10) grant the federal government authority over national matters such as defence, foreign policy, banking and criminal law . Sections 92, 92(A) and 93 assign provinces control over local subjects like education, property, hospitals and civil rights . In concurrent areas like agriculture, immigration and old-age pensions, the constitution specifies which level prevails in case of conflict . Residual powers-subjects not listed-belong to the federal Parliament .

Dispute Settlement Mechanism

Originally, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain interpreted Canada’s constitution. This body often upheld provincial autonomy from the 1880s to the 1930s. After 1949, the Supreme Court of Canada became the highest court and has tended to support a stronger federal government. This judicial role is central to maintaining Canada’s model of federalism.

Two Tiers of Government

Canada’s federation has two levels of government: federal and provincial. The federal government is headed by the Prime Minister, while the provinces are led by Premiers, with Lieutenant-Governors acting as the Crown’s representatives. Each province has its own legislature, executive, and judiciary. Although the original provincial legislatures were bicameral, they are now all unicameral. Their sizes vary widely—for example, Prince Edward Island’s legislature has only 27 members, while Quebec’s has 125.

Is Canada Federal or Unitary?

A common question is: Canada is federal or unitary? The answer is that Canada is a federal country. Since 1867, its Constitution divides power between the federal Parliament and the provincial legislatures. Provinces like Ontario, British Columbia, and Québec enjoy significant autonomy, especially in areas like education and healthcare. This confirms that Canada follows a federal model, not a unitary one.

Read also Development And Democracy of UGC NET Political Science

Models of Federalism - India

India formally adopted its Constitution on 26 January 1950. Although Article 1 describes the country as a “Union of States” and never uses the words federalism or federation, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar explained that the Indian models of federalism was designed to operate as a federation under normal conditions but could transform into a unitary system during emergencies or wartime.

Written and Rigid Constitution

India’s models of federalism is grounded in a detailed written Constitution that originally contained 22 parts, 395 Articles and 8 schedules . While the Constitution balances flexibility and rigidity, provisions related to Centre-State relations are intentionally more rigid . Amendments affecting the division of powers or the representation of states in Parliament require a special majority in both Houses of Parliament and must be ratified by at least half of the state legislatures . Compared to countries like the USA or Australia, India’s constitutional amendment process is somewhat more flexible overall but firmly safeguards the federal balance on critical issues .

Division of Powers

India uses the list-based models of federalism to distribute powers between the Union and the states . The Seventh Schedule defines this framework through three lists : the Union List (100 subjects under central jurisdiction), the State List (61 subjects) and the Concurrent List which was expanded from 47 to 52 subjects after the 42nd Amendment in 1976 . When a conflict arises between central and state laws on concurrent subjects, the Union law prevails . Like Canada, India vests residuary powers-that is, unenumerated subjects-with the Centre .

Dispute Settlement Mechanism

In India’s models of federalism, disputes between the Union and states or among states are resolved through the judiciary and inter-governmental forums . The Supreme Court holds exclusive original jurisdiction over conflicts involving : (i) the Centre and one or more states (ii) the Centre and state(s) versus other states or (iii) disputes among multiple states . It also exercises constitutional interpretation and judicial review to prevent encroachment on states’ powers . Additionally, inter-governmental bodies like the Inter-State Council (under Article 263) and the National Development Council bring together Union and state representatives to resolve tensions before they escalate into legal disputes .

Bicameral Legislature

India’s Parliament reflects the bicameral model of federalism . The Lok Sabha (House of the People) is directly elected and represents citizens nationwide . The Rajya Sabha (Council of States) represents the interests of states with members elected by state legislatures . Twelve members are also nominated by the President for their distinguished contributions to society . Unlike the U.S. Senate which provides equal representation to all states, India allocates Rajya Sabha seats proportionally by population . As a result, populous states like Uttar Pradesh hold 31 seats, while smaller states have only one each .

Dual Government

India’s federal model establishes two layers of government : the Union and the states, each with its legislature, executive and judiciary . The President is the constitutional head of the Union, while Governors are the constitutional heads of the states . The Supreme Court is the apex court at the national level and High Courts serve as the highest judicial bodies within each state . Unlike federations such as the USA and Switzerland, India maintains only single citizenship namely Indian citizenship for all citizens underscoring its emphasis on unity within diversity .

Models of Federalism - USA

The American model of federalism constitutionally divides power and sovereignty between the federal government and the states . Compared to many other Models of Federalism, the U.S. grants broader powers to states . This is evident in several ways: amendments to the Constitution require the consent of three-fourths of the states, each state has equal representation in the Senate regardless of size and the Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government for the states .

Written and Rigid Constitution

The United States operates under a written and rigid Constitution drafted in 1787 which establishes a federal model where both the national and state governments exercise defined powers . This Constitution is among the most stable in the world, having been formally amended only 27 times highlighting the deliberate rigidity of this Models of Federalism .

Bicameral Legislature

The U.S. Congress is bicameral, consisting of the Senate (upper house) and the House of Representatives (lower house). Under this bicameral model of federalism, all states—large or small—have equal representation in the Senate, reinforcing the principle of state sovereignty. The President serves as both head of state and government in a presidential system, elected for a four-year term. The U.S. political landscape is dominated by a two-party system and a complex electoral process.

Division of Powers

The Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers . Article I, Section 8 lists the enumerated powers reserved for the federal government such as regulating interstate commerce, coining money and declaring war . Meanwhile, the Tenth Amendment safeguards reserved powers for the states, covering areas like education, local courts, law enforcement, intrastate business and municipal governance .

Some powers, known as concurrent powers, are shared between the federal and state governments, including taxation, constructing roads, and establishing lower courts.

Article VI contains the Supremacy Clause, which establishes that federal laws and treaties override conflicting state laws, ensuring national coherence within the American models of federalism.

Dispute Settling Mechanism

The Supreme Court of the United States plays a central role in interpreting the Constitution and resolving conflicts between state and federal authority . Through its decisions, the Court upholds the balance and integrity of the American Models of Federalism .

Conclusion

A federal model works because it marries unity with diversity. It gives a country one flag and one national policy voice, while letting regions govern local matters. The constitution draws the line; courts defend it; intergovernmental bodies and fiscal rules keep the machine running. Across time and place, we see many models of federalism—dual, cooperative, creative/coercive, new federalism, picket-fence, symmetric/asymmetric, and coming- vs. holding-together—each with different blends of clarity, collaboration, and autonomy.

India shows how a large, diverse country can hold together using a Union Model that mixes strong national capacity with genuine state roles, backed by constitutional lists and cooperative councils. Canada is federal or unitary? Canada illustrates another path: a constitutional monarchy that is unmistakably federal, with powers shared between Ottawa and the provinces. The lesson across cases is simple: federalism is not one model but a family of models each a different answer to the same question of how to divide and share power in a single country.

Start your journey towards acing your government exams with Testbook. Sign up now and gain access to the best study material, expert guidance and practice tests to help you achieve your dreams!