Sources of International Law: Types, Scope, Examples and Case Laws

International law is the rules that govern states and international organizations and in areas like human rights, crimes and environment shape certain cross-border actions of individuals. There’s no world parliament; legitimacy comes from recognized sources of international law.

• Authoritative list : ICJ Statute, Article 38(1)
  • Primary sources: Treaties, customary international law, general principles of law.
  • Subsidiary means: Judicial decisions and scholarly writings (to identify/apply rules).
• Increasing influence : Soft law, UN resolutions and decisions of international organizations often guide state practice and court reasoning.

For learners, mastering these sources shows how rules emerge and gain acceptance. In India, courts typically apply treaties when incorporated into domestic law and respect customary norms where they do not conflict with statutes or the Constitution .

Sources of Law as defined by Eminent Jurists

Over time, various jurists have assessed and clarified the concept of sources of international law to bring clear understanding to this complex subject. The following are some important definitions provided by renowned scholars:

• Herbert Briggs: Described sources as “the methods or processes by which international law is created.” It highlighted the procedural aspect of law-making rather than only the end result.
• George Schwarzenberger: Proposed a distinction between:
  • Law-Creating Processes: The primary sources of international law that establish legal rules such as treaties, customary international law and general principles of law.
  • Law-Determining Agencies: The means that help identify, interpret and apply legal rules including judicial decisions and the writings of eminent jurists.
• Oppenheim: Differentiated between:
• Formal Sources: The formal sources of international law that confer legal validity and authority upon a rule.
• Material Sources: The elements that provide the substantive content of legal rules such as political, social or moral considerations.

Read also Judicial Independence of UGC NET Political Science

Sources of International Law PDF Download

Students can download a ready-to-use Sources of International Law PDF for quick revision. It includes:

• Primary and subsidiary sources of international law
• Simple explanations with examples and case laws
• Exam-focused sources of international law notes for UPSC, UGC NET, CLAT
• Easy format to save time and improve accuracy

Download Sources of International Law Notes

Types of Sources of International Law

The primary sources of international law include treaties, customary international law and general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. These form the foundation for establishing binding rules governing relations among states. Additionally, judicial decisions and the writings of eminent jurists are an important subsidiary means to identify and interpret legal norms. The following are the types of sources of international law:

Treaties as a Source of International Law

International treaties are the most important sources of international law. They are formal and written agreements between states that are legally binding under international law. They are a primary source of international law which are recognized under Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and play an important role in providing clarity and precision to the rights and obligations of states.

Treaties can be bilateral (between two states) or multilateral (among several states) encompassing a wide series of areas such as peace settlements, trade, human rights and environmental protection.

Definition and Legal Framework

A treaty is defined as a: “An international agreement concluded between states in written form and governed by international law, whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular designation.”

The 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions explain that the title of an instrument whether called a convention, pact, declaration or covenant—does not affect its legal character. The Convention also confirms that every state possesses the capacity to conclude treaties and provides rules for creation, interpretation, enforcement and termination.

Significance and Legal Effect

Treaties as a source of international law are important because they reflect the express consent of states to be legally bound. This consent-based nature distinguishes treaties from customary international law which evolves from consistent state practice and opinio juris.

Treaties bring predictability and stability to international relations, facilitating cooperation and peaceful coexistence. They are often faster to develop than custom, as they do not require prolonged practice. Additionally, treaties may codify existing customary law or create entirely new norms.

The UN Charter is itself a treaty and forms the foundation of modern international law laying down principles governing peace, security and friendly relations. Other examples include the Genocide Convention and the Convention on Biological Diversity which establish comprehensive legal obligations on their subject matters.

Types of Treaties

The following are the types of International Treaties:

• Law-Making Treaties (Normative Treaties)
  These treaties create general rules intended to guide all states or a significant portion of the international community. They have a norm-creating character and may over time contribute to customary international law. Examples of Treaties:
  • The UN Charter
  • The Genocide Convention
• Treaty-Contracts
  These are agreements between a limited number of states resembling private contracts. They create binding rights and duties only among the parties and usually lack broader law-making impact. Examples include bilateral agreements on loans, trade concessions, or border arrangements.

Read also Welfare State of UGC NET Political Science

Custom as a Source of Law

Customary international law is one of the most important and oldest sources of international law. It is recognized in Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, which describes it as “international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law.”

Unlike treaties, customs are which are written agreements, custom develops gradually through the consistent conduct of states. Over time, certain behaviors and practices become accepted as legally binding rules. Customary law is based on two essential elements:

State Practice (Objective Element)

This means actual conduct by states like what they do in their relations with each other. State practice must be general, consistent and sufficiently widespread especially among states whose interests are most affected.

While practice must be largely uniform, minor discrepancies do not prevent the formation of a rule. For example, in the Fisheries and Nicaragua cases, the ICJ held that occasional deviations do not negate custom if the general pattern is uniform.

Opinio Juris (Subjective Element)

This refers to the belief that a practice is followed because it is legally required not just out of habit, courtesy or convenience. In other words, states act a certain way because they consider themselves under a legal obligation. The ICJ in the North Sea Continental Shelf case highlighted that a settled practice must also be accompanied by opinio juris for it to become binding custom. The absence of opinio juris can mean that a practice remains mere usage or politeness rather than law. The following are some of the examples of Custom as a Source of International Law:

• The prohibition of genocide and torture
• Diplomatic immunities
• The principle of non-intervention
• Rules governing the law of the sea (before they were codified in treaties)

Importance of Custom as a Source of International Law

Customary international law is binding on all states irrespective of whether they have signed any treaties on the subject unless they are persistent objectors who have consistently opposed the practice while it was developing into a rule.

Custom as a source of international law plays an important role in areas not yet regulated by treaties and often complements treaty provisions by clarifying or filling gaps. Many fundamental principles of international law including basic humanitarian norms and rules on state responsibility have their origin in custom.

Jus Cogens as a Source of International Law

Jus cogens or peremptory norms are the most fundamental rules in sources of international law. They are universally binding and non-derogable which means that no state can override them even by mutual agreement. Examples include prohibitions on genocide, slavery, torture and aggression.

These norms safeguards the primary values of the international community and invalidate any treaty or agreement that conflicts with them. Their recognition grew in the 20th century as states responded to grave human rights abuses.

The International Law Commission has been central in defining and codifying jus cogens, ensuring their continued relevance. The concept of jus cogens rooted in Roman law shows that international law upholds essential principles beyond state consent.

While identifying new jus cogens norms can be contentious and requires broad agreement but their existence reflects a universal commitment to safeguard fundamental rights and maintain basic standards of human conduct.

Read also National Unity of UGC NET Political Science

General Principles of Law as a Source of International Law

General principles of law recognised by civilised nations are the third main source of international law under Article 38(1)(c) of the ICJ Statute. These principles fill voids where treaties or customary rules are lacking and prevent situations of non liquet i.e., where no applicable law appears to exist.

Examples include good faith, equity, pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept), the right of self-defence, res judicata (finality of judgments) and the idea that no one can be a judge in their own cause.

Equity is especially important which allows international law some flexibility while maintaining justice. For instance, in the Law of the Sea, delimitation of maritime boundaries must be based on equitable principles. Several cases illustrate the application of general principles :

• Aegean Sea Continental Shelf case (Greece v. Turkey) : The ICJ highlighted interpreting international law as it exists at the time of judgment, not when drafted.
• Diversion of Water from the Meuse case (Netherlands v. Belgium, 1937) : Judge Hudson ruled equity as part of international law especially relevant when both sides committed similar violations.
• Rann of Kutch Arbitration (India v. Pakistan, 1968) : The tribunal agreed that equity could guide the resolution of disputes.
• Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case: Britain’s long inaction amounted to acquiescence which led the Court to uphold Norway’s delimitation of fishing zones.
• Frontier Dispute case (Mali v. Burkina Faso): The ICJ ruled that equity could not override established colonial frontiers.
• Tehran Hostages case: Judge Morozov, dissenting, applied the clean hands doctrine, arguing the U.S. had forfeited its claim by launching a rescue operation and sanctions against Iran.
• Arrest Warrant case: Judge Van den Wyngaert’s dissent applied clean hands, finding Congo could not bring its claim due to its own failure to prosecute Mr. Yerodia.

Judicial Decisions as a Source of International Law

Judicial decisions are a subsidiary source of international law. Though not binding beyond the specific parties to a dispute (per Article 59 of the ICJ Statute) rulings by bodies like the ICJ, International Criminal Court (ICC) and arbitral tribunals carry significant persuasive weight.

These decisions explain existing rules, help fill legal gaps and over time can shape the development of customary norms. For instance, ICJ judgments have influenced the law on state responsibility and the use of force while international criminal courts have defined concepts like crimes against humanity.

Courts also interpret principles such as equity, proportionality and due diligence, offering guidance where treaties or customs are silent. Their jurisprudence has supported the recognition of emerging rights including environmental protection and rights of indigenous peoples.

Influence of Legal Scholars

Under Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute, the opinions of respected jurists are a secondary means of source of international law. Though not a primary source, scholarly writings help interpret, develop and critique legal rules.

Experts analyze treaties, state practice, and court decisions, offering insights and proposing reforms. Courts often cite scholars as persuasive references particularly in areas where treaty or customary law is unclear such as early international criminal law or emerging fields like data protection and environmental regulation.

Equity as a Principle

Although equity is not formally named as a source of international law, it is used by courts to achieve fairness and justice when applying legal norms. Equitable principles help ensure that strict legal rules do not lead to unreasonable results, as seen in cases involving maritime boundaries where fairness guides decisions beyond rigid formulas. Equity also fills gaps when the law is silent or ambiguous. However, courts apply it cautiously to maintain predictability and legal certainty.

Read also Global Governance of UGC NET Political Science

Sources Of International Law Scope

The scope of the sources of international law is extremely wide. They regulate almost every area of international relations and cooperation among states. The primary sources—treaties, customary international law, and general principles—cover the most important and binding obligations. Subsidiary sources—judicial decisions and juristic writings—guide interpretation. Modern developments have also introduced new sources like UN resolutions, soft law, and jus cogens norms.

The scope extends to:

• Peace and Security: Treaties like the UN Charter regulate the use of force, collective security, and self-defence. Customary law prohibits aggression and establishes rules on neutrality. General principles and ICJ judgments add doctrines like proportionality and necessity.
• Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Treaties such as the ICCPR and the Geneva Conventions protect fundamental rights in peace and armed conflict. Customary norms, like the prohibition of torture and arbitrary killing, apply universally.
• International Trade and Economy: WTO treaties, investment agreements, and customs regulate commerce. Dispute settlement panels interpret these treaties and shape economic obligations.
• Environmental Protection: Framework treaties like the Paris Agreement, supported by soft law instruments such as the Rio Declaration, address climate change and sustainable development.
• Maritime Law: UNCLOS governs oceans, navigation, and resources, but many of its rules originated in custom, such as freedom of the high seas. Tribunals often apply equitable principles to resolve maritime boundary disputes.
• Criminal Law and State Responsibility: The Rome Statute codifies crimes like genocide, while customary law confirms their binding nature. The Articles on State Responsibility, prepared by the International Law Commission, codify liability for wrongful acts.
• Emerging Areas: International law is expanding into space law, cyber law, and regulation of new technologies, drawing from treaties, custom, and general principles.

This broad scope demonstrates that the sources of international law adapt to global changes while maintaining stability in fundamental areas.

Sources Of International Law Examples

Examples illustrate how each source of international law works in practice. They also make sources of international law notes more concrete and exam-ready.

• Treaty Example: The UN Charter is a treaty that forms the basis of modern international law, especially on peace and security. It governs the use of force and the role of the Security Council.
• Customary Law Example: Diplomatic immunity, even before it was codified, existed as a customary practice accepted by states as law. The prohibition of torture is another universally accepted customary rule.
• General Principle Example: The principle of good faith ensures that states honour their obligations honestly. The doctrine of res judicata guarantees that a matter once settled by judgment cannot be reopened.
• Judicial Decision Example: In the North Sea Continental Shelf case, the ICJ clarified how custom develops and applied equitable principles to resolve boundary disputes.
• Soft Law Example: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, though non-binding, has strongly influenced later treaties and customary norms.
• UN Resolution Example: The 1970 Declaration on Friendly Relations is not binding, but it reflects and strengthens the customary principle of non-intervention.
• Jus Cogens Example: The prohibition of slavery is a peremptory norm that overrides any conflicting treaty or practice.

These examples show how different sources interact to create a coherent legal framework.

Sources Of International Law Case Laws

Case law demonstrates how international courts interpret and apply the sources of international law. These rulings not only settle disputes but also clarify and expand the law.

• North Sea Continental Shelf (1969): The ICJ held that equidistance in maritime delimitation was not customary law without sufficient state practice and opinio juris. This case set the standard for identifying custom.
• Nicaragua v. United States (1986): The Court ruled that the prohibition of force exists both as a treaty rule and as customary law. It also used UN resolutions as evidence of opinio juris.
• Corfu Channel Case (1949): The ICJ held Albania responsible for mines in its waters, establishing the principle of state responsibility and the duty of due diligence.
• Right of Passage over Indian Territory (1960): The Court recognized a special customary right of passage between Portugal and India, showing that particular customs can exist between states.
• Reservations to the Genocide Convention (1951): The ICJ clarified the conditions under which reservations to treaties are valid, balancing treaty flexibility with the integrity of core obligations.
• Fisheries Case (1951): The Court upheld Norway’s delimitation practices due to consistent state practice and acquiescence by others, confirming the role of custom.

These cases are central in any set of sources of public international law notes as they explain how theory operates in practice.

Practice by International Organizations

International organizations play a crucial role in developing and applying the sources of international law. While they do not create law in the same way as treaties or custom, their practice shapes global norms.

• International Court of Justice (ICJ): The ICJ applies Article 38 sources to decide disputes. Its judgments interpret treaties, clarify custom, and invoke general principles, which are then cited as persuasive authority worldwide.
• UN General Assembly: Its resolutions are not binding, but when widely supported, they reflect global consensus and can help crystallize customary norms. They also provide evidence of opinio juris.
• UN Security Council: Under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, its resolutions are binding on all member states. These resolutions have authorized peacekeeping missions, imposed sanctions, and regulated uses of force.
• International Law Commission (ILC): The ILC drafts legal texts that often become treaties, such as the Vienna Convention, and codifies customary rules, such as the Articles on State Responsibility.
• Specialized Agencies: Organizations like the WTO, WHO, and IMO set technical standards and resolve disputes. Their decisions and guidelines often shape state practice, influencing both treaties and custom.

Through these activities, international organizations ensure that the source of international law is not static but evolves with international needs.

Sources of International Law in Indian Context

India recognizes and applies the sources of international law in both its constitutional framework and judicial practice.

• Constitutional Provisions:
  • Article 51 of the Constitution directs the state to foster respect for international law and treaty obligations. Though non-justiciable, it reflects India’s commitment to international norms.
  • Article 253 empowers Parliament to make laws for implementing international treaties and agreements.
• Judicial Approach:
  Indian courts often interpret domestic law in harmony with international obligations:
  • Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): The Supreme Court used the CEDAW Convention to frame guidelines on sexual harassment in the absence of specific legislation.
  • People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997): The Court referred to the ICCPR when discussing the right to privacy and liberty.
  • Environmental cases have applied principles from international law, such as sustainable development and the polluter-pays principle, reflecting soft law and customary norms.
• Customary International Law: India accepts customary norms unless they directly conflict with domestic law. For example, diplomatic immunity and rules on state responsibility are observed.
• Jus Cogens and Human Rights: India aligns with peremptory norms such as prohibitions on slavery, torture, and genocide.

This shows that India integrates both traditional and modern sources of international law into its domestic system, ensuring that international norms shape national law and practice.

Role of International Bodies in Developing Law

International organizations, especially those under the UN have become important drivers of international law-making. Resolutions from bodies like the UN General Assembly are not binding but reflect collective opinion and can influence customary law over time if states consistently follow them.

Institutions like the International Law Commission draft texts that become key treaties, such as the Vienna Convention. Specialized agencies like IMO and WHO create widely adopted standards in areas like maritime safety and public health. These organizations also help coordinate global efforts on issues like climate change and terrorism, enabling states to agree on common legal standards and cooperative measures.

Conclusion

The sources of international law provide the foundation for global governance. Treaties, custom, and general principles create binding rules, while judicial decisions, juristic writings, UN resolutions, and jus cogens norms guide and expand them. Their scope spans peace, trade, rights, environment, and justice, supported by key case laws and the practice of international organizations. In the Indian context, constitutional provisions and landmark judgments show how global norms shape national law. To explain the various sources of international law is to see them as practical tools, and preparing sources of international law notes or sources of public international law notes helps in mastering this vital subject.olarly writings, each source contributes to creating, interpreting, and applying binding rules.

Start your journey towards acing your government exams with Testbook. Sign up now and gain access to the best study material, expert guidance and practice tests to help you achieve your dreams!