
How Can a Juvenile be Tried as an Adult in Court? - UPSC Notes | Testbook.com
The Process of Trying Juveniles as Adults – An Explanation
The National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has set forth certain guidelines for the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) to conduct an initial assessment under Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 (JJ Act, 2015).
- The main aim of these guidelines is to determine whether the accused should be treated as a minor or an adult during the trial.
- The preliminary assessment's purpose is to ascertain if a child is capable of being tried as an adult.
Determining the Age:
- The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 (JJ Act) defines a child as a person who has not yet attained the age of 18 years.
- As per the Juvenile Justice Act of 2015, juveniles aged between 16 to 18 who commit grave crimes can be tried as adults.
- Section 15 of the JJ Act requires the Board to conduct a preliminary assessment of the child's mental and physical capacity to commit the severe crime, to determine whether the child has attained or is above the age of sixteen.
Defining Heinous Offences:
- As per Section 2(33) of the JJ Act 2015, "heinous offences" are those crimes for which the Indian Penal Code , 1860, or any other law in force prescribes a minimum punishment of seven years imprisonment or more.
- An offence is considered a “heinous offence” if its minimum sentence is seven years of imprisonment or more.
The Role of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) and Preliminary Assessment
The primary goal of the preliminary assessment is to determine whether the minor, aged between 16 and 18, should be tried as an adult in the case of a grave offence.
-
There are two key conditions that necessitate a preliminary assessment.
- Firstly, the crime falls under the Act's classification of "heinous" offences.
- Secondly, the minor accused of the crime is aged between 16 and 18.
- The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) is solely responsible for conducting preliminary assessments, which must be completed within three months from the date the child was first produced before it.
- If the Board believes that the child should be tried as an adult, the case is then transferred to the Children’s Court.
The Need for a 'Serious Offences' Category in the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015:
- When a child is accused of committing a crime that does not fit neatly into one of the categories listed in the JJ Act of 2015, the legal consequences for the child should be prioritized.
- In the recent case of Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that a crime with a minimum sentence of only seven years cannot be considered extremely serious.
- The Act, however, does not address the fourth category of offences: those with a maximum punishment exceeding 7 years in jail, but no minimum sentence or a minimum term of less than 7 years.
- Until Parliament takes a decision, these offences will be classified as “serious offences” as per the interpretation of the Act.
Related Links | |||
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) | POCSO Act | ||
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) | The POCSO (Amendment) Act, 2019 | ||
IAS Eligibility | UNICEF |
More Articles for IAS Preparation
- How AI Helped Find an Antibiotic for a Superbug | UPSC Current Affairs
- Inspiring Journey of Govind Jaiswal: From Rickshaw Puller's Son to IAS Officer
- How Bhutan Graduated from the ‘Least Developed Country’ Status
- Poverty Identification and Estimation in India - Testbook
- Hot Springs: Formation, Benefits, and Dangers - Testbook
- Number of UPSC Attempts for SC - Detailed Information
- UPSC History - Comprehensive Syllabus for Prelims, Mains & Optional - Testbook.com
- UPSC OBC Attempt Limit and Eligibility Conditions - Testbook.com
- UPSC Exam Attempts for General Category - Testbook.com

UPSC Beginners Program
Get UPSC Beginners Program - 60 Days Foundation Course SuperCoaching @ just
People also like
