In a surprising turn of events, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to postpone his government’s ambitious plan to revamp the country's judicial system in March 2023. This decision followed several months of intense protests against the proposed reforms. Supporters argue that these changes will restore the balance of power while critics fear that it will undermine the judiciary and pave the way for authoritarian rule. Let's delve into the intricate details of these proposed reforms and their implications. This is a crucial topic for the IAS exam international relations segment.

Israel Judicial Reform 2023: UPSC Notes | Testbook.com
An Overview of the 2023 Israeli Judicial Reforms
The proposed reforms by Prime Minister Netanyahu entail the following changes:
- The Supreme Court would require a supermajority of up to 80-100 percent to overturn any legislation.
- A Parliament similar to the Canadian model could overrule a Supreme Court decision with a simple majority.
- Israel’s Basic Laws, akin to a Constitution, would be immune from judicial review .
- Lawmakers would have more influence over the appointment of judges.
- The corruption laws would be amended to address two of Netanyahu’s three cases.
- The reform proposals also include legal protections for prime ministers, ministers, and members of the Knesset for any crimes committed in relation to their official duties.
The government is pushing for these reforms due to the following reasons:
- Israel’s political landscape has gradually shifted to the far right. The current administration is the most right-wing in the country’s history.
- The far-right and religious parties contend that the balance between the judiciary, the government, and the legislature has been disrupted.
- They argue that the judiciary is dominated by liberals and leftists, which is in stark contrast to the political shift to the right.
- The government wishes to introduce legislation that would exempt religious Jews from conscription.
- They are also seeking to prohibit legal authorities from deposing the Prime Minister as “unfit to rule.”
- However, they fear that the Supreme Court may overturn these measures unless the judiciary’s powers are curtailed.
Also read: The Doctrine of Separation of Power in the Indian Constitution .
Despite the strong push for these reforms, Mr. Netanyahu decided to back off. Here’s why:
- Protesters voiced concerns that the proposed legislation would weaken the judiciary and undermine the system’s checks and balances.
- The opponents of these Bills included not only the general public but also Israel’s reservists and its diplomatic community.
- Several spontaneous protests broke out across the country, and Israel’s largest union went on strike, leading to a shutdown of government buildings, universities, and public spaces.
- Given the massive public backlash, Mr. Netanyahu decided to postpone his plans.
More Articles for IAS Preparation
- IPS Syllabus - Detailed UPSC Prelims & Mains Syllabus for IPS Exam
- India's Bilateral Relations - Testbook
- Is Laxmikant Enough for UPSC Mains
- Island Development Agency (IDA) - Overview, Meetings and Development Plans
- Is the UPSC Exam Very Tough? - Analysis and Tips | Testbook.com
- Israel’s Cyber Defense War Room [UPSC Current Affairs] | Testbook
- IAS Preparation - Complete Guide for UPSC Exam | Testbook.com
- Islamic Banking - Understanding Its Principles, Origin, Tools, and Advantages
- ISRO Notes for UPSC - Indian Space Research Organisation Overview & Achievements
- Islamic Conquest of North India and the Gangetic Plains - Testbook.com
Frequently Asked Questions

UPSC Beginners Program
Get UPSC Beginners Program - 60 Days Foundation Course SuperCoaching @ just
₹50000₹0
🪙 Your Total Savings ₹50000
People also like
